Registration Fee ---


Grand Prize and Top 10

Jul 06, 2018

Table Read My Screenplay - Hollywood


Table Read My Screenplay will help to propel your screenwriting career forward with the Table Read showcase experience, an opportunity to confidently pitch to a range of 200 industry professionals with the title of “Grand Prize Winner” at the 22nd Annual Hollywood Pitch Festival, and a support mechanism for layering a long-term career with an invitation to be a part of the elite ISA Development Slate.


GRAND PRIZE WINNER (Features and TV Pilots)

Gain exposure with directors, producers and other industry pros through a live Table Read performance of your script, an invitation to the ISA Development Slate and an all-access pass to the 22nd Annual Hollywood Pitch Festival, plus many more exciting prizes.

Table Read Director: Cady McClain
McClain is a two time Emmy Award Winning Actor, Director and Producer. Her credits include studio and independent films, network and cable television, New Media, Off-Broadway theater, and performance art. 

Prior to your Table Read showcase, the director will personally meet with you to workshop your script with professional actors. You’ll also get the opportunity to pitch to over 200 Industry Professionals at the Hollywood Pitch Festival, and as an elite member of the ISA Development Slate, the Career Development team will work with you for a minimum of 1 year to continue getting you and your script in front of more Producers, Literary Representatives and other Industry Executives from companies like Lakeshore Entertainment, Gidden Media, ICM, and others.

The one-on-one story session with J.V. Hart will include an analysis of the existing draft charting the characters’ journey and diagnostic recommendations, phone consultations during the rewrite utilizing the HartChart insights and J.V.’s analysis of the revised draft.

TRMS would like to award a special honor in celebration of the local talent. This accolade will be offered to a Feature or TV Pilot writer who resides within 100 miles of Los Angeles.

Prior to your Table Read showcase, director, Cady McClain, will personally meet with you to workshop your script with professional actors. You’ll also get the opportunity to pitch to over 200 Industry Professionals at the Hollywood Pitch Festival, and consideration to become an elite member of the ISA Development Slate.

The one-on-one story session with J.V. Hart will include an analysis of the existing draft charting the characters’ journey and diagnostic recommendations, phone consultations during the rewrite utilizing the HartChart insights and J.V.’s analysis of the revised draft.

SHORTS PRIZE WINNER (Includes Web Series Pilots)
Your winning short will be recorded by professional actors and posted as a podcast on the ISA’s Curious About Screenwriting Network.

You will be considered for acceptance onto the ISA Development Slate where we will share your script and podcast episode to ISA approved Industry Pros and new media outlets including AwesomenessTV and more. If you produce your short script within 18 months of winning, we’ll cover your entry fee towards three major Hollywood short film festivals.


Career Coaching with Lee Jessup - Over the past 20+ years, Lee has mentored established and emerging screenwriters in film, television and new media, while also consulting and instructing for major networks and studios.

Exposure through The Tracking Board website’s ISA Spotlight section, and a dedicated announcement submitted to over 1,700 Industry Professionals for review.

A Copy of (Not Just) Another Book on The Craft of Screenwriting by Max Timm, Director of Education and Outreach with the International Screenwriters’ Association and Founder of The Story Farm.

Additional Prizes from the Top 10 and Semi-Finalist categories.

TOP 10 

TOP 100
The HartChart story mapping tool is a tangible solution to your blank page fears. Following J.V. Hart’s process and protocol will transform your understanding of your story and get you to ‘The End’ without losing your sanity along the way. Whether breaking a new story, or tightening a draft, Hart shares his strategies with committed writers all over the world with a guarantee that you never face a blank page again.


Go beyond the basics of screenwriting, forget all of the fancy vocabulary, and let’s get your script finished! Receive immediate access to all lessons, lectures, and audio, and the material provided within this full development screenwriting course will help you build your script, one step at a time. This course allows you to work at your own pace and finish a script in 11 weeks! You can start and finish whenever you like.

« Back to Contests
MORE BY AUTHOR: Articles Podcasts Classes Contests
Looks like you are already a registered member!! please login to add comment. You will be redirected to login in 10 second(s) or click here to login

Feedback Type

Additional Fee Added to Entry

  • First 20 Pages Feedback (1-2 pages of notes): $30
  • General Feedback (2-3 pages of notes): $55
  • Extensive Feedback (up to 5 pages of notes): $120

Feedback Type Description

First 20 Pages Feedback (1-2 Pages) – So much of the opportunity available to your script is spent within the first twenty pages. You need to make sure the hook, teaser, cold open… grabs the reader and presents you like it should. This analysis will give you those answers.

General Feedback (2-3 Pages) – You know your work inside and out, now it’s time to get a second opinion. We’ll read your full script, and you’ll receive a detailed personalized critique on what we see, what we think, and suggestions on where to go next.

Extensive Feedback (Up to 5 Pages) – For those looking for an extensive breakdown of the inner-workings of their creative material. Writers who select this Analysis will receive suggestions on how to improve overall writing, story, structure, characters, pacing, stakes, climax and resolution, specific problem scenes, tone and overall commercial appeal.


  • This contest is open to anyone except all employees, judges, directors, associates, and immediate families of the TABLE READ MY SCREENPLAY (TRMS) Contest.
  • The writer is under no obligation to participate in the contest, and understands that it is not a guarantee or expectation of employment.
  • We do not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, veteran status, or disability. It is our intention that all qualified submissions be given equal opportunity and that selection decisions are based on script-related factors alone.
  • Up to four scripts may be entered on one entry form. Additional scripts can be entered through an additional entry form.
  • Promotional discounts offered may only be utilized at the time of submission and no partial refund for a promotional code may be issued after an entry has been officially submitted.
  • Once material has been entered, no substitutions of new drafts or corrections will be considered after 24 hours from original submission time and date have past. After this time the writer may complete a new entry form and pay the appropriate entry fee to submit a revised version of their script.
  • Loglines may be changed once during the competition by e-mailing with a revised logline; the writer must include the Title and Date of the original submission in the body of the e-mail along with the logline.
  • Feedback is a separate service with an additional fee, and unless specifically part of a promotion, is not an expected part of any entry. Feedback is in no way tied to contest placement.
  • The writer understands that feedback, whether paid or received as part of a promotion, can take 90 days or more to be returned, and may not be received before the end of the contest. TRMS will make all attempts to return feedback as soon as possible.
  • TRMS does not provide notes and/or scoring with every entry.
    Grand Prize Winners from previous TRMS seasons may submit again, provided the contest city is not the same for which they previously won, and they must submit a new screenplay to be eligible.
    Previous Shorts Prize Winners may enter a Feature to any contest. If a writer wins the Grand Prize in two cities they may no longer submit.
  • Those who have placed as a Top 10 or Category Winner three times with three separate screenplays are ineligible to submit in any future contest season.
  • To be considered for the ISA Hollywood Writer Award the writer must currently reside within 100 miles of Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA. The ISA Hollywood Writer Award recipient will not receive airfare or hotel.
    The Hollywood Writer Award Winner will be provided a $50 stipend to cover gas and parking for the TRMS events.
  • International writers are eligible to participate in the contest, so long as their participation is not prevented by law in either country.
  • TRMS will provide roundtrip airfare up to $800 for a Domestic flight or $1500 for an International flight not to exceed $1500. There is no cash reimbursement for flights that cost more than the limit, nor will there be a disbursement of the difference for flights that are less than the limit.
  • Adaptations from other works are permissible provided the writer has written permission to adapt the work from the original source.
  • Adaptations of works in the public domain are permissible, however the writer assumes all responsibility assuring copyright status.
  • Collaborative work is eligible; the writers are responsible for the distribution of the contest prize(s). Only one pass and airfare & hotel for a single writer will be awarded to the Grand Prize Winner.
  • Writers under the age of 18 years old must have parent or legal guardian’s permission to participate.
  • The script and any related materials must not be in a current option agreement, and/or may not have been previously sold or produced for profit.
  • The writer understands and accepts without reservation that they are an independent contractor and that the contest administrators and sponsors are not responsible for withholding any taxes or payments on prize money to any government agency, at any level, be it local, state, or federal.
  • The writer understands that it is their sole responsibility to register material with the U.S. Copyright Office and/or with the Writers Guild of America West or the appropriate agency in his/her country.
  • The writer must retain at least one copy of the submitted material, and understands that any material we receive cannot and will not be returned under any circumstances.
  • Script Length Guidelines: ?Feature – (70 – 130 pages), TV Pilots – (10 – 70 pages), Shorts – (1 – 45 pages), Web Series Pilots (1-20 pages)
  • Scripts longer than recommended length will still be considered for the contest, and will not be disqualified.
  • If a screenplay is submitted for feedback and is over 130 pages, an additional service fee of $1 per page will apply; the writer will be invoiced separately for the fee. If the writer does not wish to pay an additional fee, the Feedback Reader will be instructed to read the first 130 pages only.
  • All entries must be received by Final Deadline. TRMS reserves the right to extend the contest deadline up to 90 days.
    TRMS is not responsible for late, lost, unacceptably formatted, corrupt, or incorrect submissions, and may not be able to honor such entries.
  • The writer may submit their screenplay to any other person, contest, producer, agent, publisher, and/or organization.
  • The writer retains all rights to their screenplay, subject to the terms and agreements contained herein.
  • The writer assures that to the best of their knowledge they have the legal right to submit it for judging to TRMS.
  • The writer understands that their logline and/or screenplay will be reviewed by ISA and TRMS employees and/or our panel of Industry Judges for evaluation. The writer also understands that any one of these employees or judges may have been or may be exploring ideas similar to those contained in scripts they read, and hereby waives any claim that TRMS, its employees or judges may have misappropriated any ideas or portions of their submission logline or script.
  • No agreement for compensation, other than the TRMS prizes listed, has been implied.
  • TRMS intends to submit the Top 100 List to respected producers on behalf of the writer. The writer may withdraw from this process at any time.
  • Confirmation of entry will be received once a script is submitted with an entry form and completed with an entry fee through our payment vendor. The writer must provide a valid e-mail address with entry; if an email address should change after submission, it is the writer’s responsibility to let us know.
  • The writer understands that the ISA and TRMS will be free to use their name and likeness for advertising or promotional purposes without additional consideration, should the writer make it past the first round.
    All winners agree to give permission to the ISA, TRMS and other sponsors for associated contest audio and video recordings of the Table Read and other events to be used on websites and social media platforms.
  • TRMS reserves the right to award a cash prize at its discretion. The Winner is under no obligation to accept the associated prizes but will not be awarded or owed a cash replacement upon electing not to move forward with prizes offered.
  • TRMS may develop a series or documentary style program based on the inner workings of the contest and the production resulting there from. TRMS reserves the right to contact the writer with offers to participate in any such production. The writer is under no obligation to participate therein.
  • All Grand Prize, Top 10 and Semifinalist choices are made at the express decision of TRMS, and once made are considered final.
  • The writer agrees to accept without reservation the decisions rendered by the judges.
  • There are no refunds for submissions at any time for any reason.
  • TRMS has the right to change or add to the prizes at any time, without notice, and/or substitute prizes of equal or lesser value.
  • Additional rules may be amended at the sole discretion of TRMS.
  • By selecting ‘I have Read and Understand the Contest Rules’ on the entry page and submitting, the writer agrees to all of these rules.



Q: How do I enter Table Read My Screenplay – HOLLYWOOD?
A: Complete the form on the SUBMIT ENTRY page.

Q: How do I enter for one of the other cities?
A: Only one Table Read My Screenplay competition is held at any time. Our next host city will be announced at a later date.

Q: What forms of payment do you accept?
A:  We accept all payments through PayPal, however you do not need a PayPal account to use it. Once you are taken to the payment page, you can select “Pay by Credit/Debit Card.”

Q: Do you accept check or money order by mail.
A: No; all payments must be made through PayPal.

Q:  I would like to mail you a hardcopy of my script. How can I do that?
A: In an effort to maintain a green company, we only accept screenplays and teleplays through our website or one of our partner websites (the ISA, FilmFreeway, WithoutABox).

Q: Should I include my contact information on my title page?
A: If you choose to do so, you may include your contact information on the title page, but it does not affect judging either way if you choose not to include it.

Q: Who will be reading my screenplay/judging the contest?
A: The final panel of judges will be comprised of screenwriting and other industry professionals, including but not limited to producers, managers and established writers.

Q: If I win will you fly me to Hollywood?
A: It depends which category you enter:

The Grand Prize Winner will receive coach airfare and accommodations resulting in a three-night stay.
The Shorts Prize Winner will receive $750, which can be put toward airfare if they wish to attend; TRMS will not book the flight for the Short Prize Winner.

Q: Can I enter my Short script as a Pilot?
A: You may enter your script however you wish, however our judges will be looking for formatting and structural techniques that are unique to each medium.

Q: When is the Table Read?
A: The Grand Prize Showcase reading will be held during the Hollywood Pitch Festival in August 2018. The exact date is still TBD. If the final date as selected by TRMS does not work for the winner, TRMS will not provide any cash value matching for the non-accepted airfare and hotel. We will be as flexible as possible, but the ultimate decision resides solely with TRMS.

The Shorts Winner will receive a digital recording of their script’s Table Read no later than October 1st, 2018.

Q: Can we gift the HPF Pass to someone else?
A. The HPS Pass is not transferrable, and is forfeited if you decide not to attend.

Q: How does the Grand Prize Winner participate in the Table Read itself?
A: You sit back, relax, and observe as a director works scenes from your winning screenplay with the actors in preparation for the showcase of your first 20 pages. We will also do a full table read of your script. There you can take a few notes of what’s working and what might need some tweaking. We encourage you to watch the process rather than reading off the script because you will get to listen again when you receive the recording.

Q: Does the Shorts Prize Winner receive a Table Read?
A: The Shorts Winner will receive a live recording of their Table Read, which will be posted on ISA’s Curious About Screenwriting Network and provided to the ISA’s list of Industry Professionals.

Q: Do I maintain the rights to my screenplay?
A: YES, you retain all the rights to your screenplay. Table Read My Screenplay seeks to support and empower writers, rather than claim their hard work for ourselves. If we select your script for recognition, you agree to grant us the right to hold a live Table Read and promote your success, but the script itself is still yours.

Q: Do I need to submit a Synopsis?
A: Synopses are not required, and are not considered during the judging process.

Q: Can I submit a screenplay under a pen name?
A: Yes, you may use whatever name you wish, understanding that this is the name TRMS and the ISA will use to promote your script, should you win.

Q: Does my screenplay have to be registered with the Writers’ Guild or another organization?
A: No, but we do recommend registering your work with the WGA West, the Library of Congress Copyright office or other similar organization in your country. It’s really easy and a VERY smart thing to do.

Q: Is an adaptation of a published novel or other work written by someone else eligible?
A: You must have the legal rights to adapt the book to enter your screenplay. Either the original work must be in the public domain, or you must have the author’s permission to adapt it. Spec scripts without written permission will not be considered.

Q: Can I send you a revised copy of my script?
A: Once we have received your entry, you have 24 hours to contact us about any replacements you need to make. After the 24-hour period is through, NO script revisions will be accepted FOR ANY REASON. If you would like to enter a revised version of your screenplay, you may do so as a new entry.

Q: Can I make changes to my genre or logline?
A: Yes, you may change your listed genre or logline at any time; simply e-mail us at and let us know about the change. Once the contest is closed, we will not be able to make any changes.

Q: What stops you from taking my idea and developing it yourself?
A: Our panel of judges is comprised of respected industry professionals, and they have no intention of stealing your material. If you make it to the Semi-Finalist round, your work will be seen by these professionals, which in turn, gets you one step closer to getting your screenplay produced. You can sit at home and protect your ideas all day long hoping for that one right person to come along, or you can get your work out there and show us what you’ve got!


Q: Do you accept Web Series?
A: Yes, Web Series will be considered for the Shorts Prize and should be entered as such. However, we will only consider the “Pilot” episode of your Web Series.

Q: What about series intended for streaming (Netflix, Hulu, ABC Digital, etc.)
A: Generally-speaking it depends on script length; any Pilot over 20 Pages should be entered as a TV Pilot (like Stranger Things, Catastrophe, etc). Series with shorter episodes like Forever 31 and Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.: Slingshotshould be entered as Shorts.

Q: Be honest: can TV Pilots actually win the Grand Prize?
A. Yes, Features and Pilots compete for the same prize, and we judge each on its own merits within its medium; TV Pilots have won in the past.

Q: What’s the minimum/maximum required page length?
A: Guidelines for suggested page lengths:

Features: 70 to 130 Pages
TV Pilots: 20 to 70 Pages
Shorts: 1 to 40 Pages
Web Series: 1 to 20 Pages
Q: My Feature script is over 130 Pages. Will I be disqualified?
A: Scripts that run over suggested page lengths will not be disqualified; however, extra pages can affect everything from pacing to structure to marketability, so we would advise you to get your script as close as possible to where the industry expects it to be.

Q: Will I be charged more if I go over 130 pages?
A: The entry fee does not change. However, if you purchase feedback, we will need to invoice you $1 per page above 130 for the Reader, who will receive every cent of the additional fee.

Q: Can I enter two scripts in one document?
A: You may enter up to four scripts per entry, but all scripts MUST be in their own individual PDF document.

Q: Can I submit an episode from my series besides the Pilot for consideration?
A: We would advise against this, as our judges consider all TV episodes as if they are the first in the series. No one would read a film script that starts on page 20.

Q: Does the choice of genre matter in my submission?
A: Yes, but only to determine what your goal is for your work; ie, if you submit your script as a Comedy, we would expect it to be funny. All genres are in competition with one another, and there are no genre-specific prizes.

Q: The genre of my script is not an available choice; how should I enter?
A: You should choose the genre that is most closely associated with your script – if you have any questions, feel free to e-mail us at That said, we will not consider scripts for documentary, erotica, reality TV or musicals.

Q: Can I submit my screenplay in multiple genres?
A: Yes, you can; however, you will have to pay an entry fee each time as if they were separate scripts. That said, we do not require you to enter any script more than one time. Genre suggestions are simply for guidance.

Q: Can multiple scripts from one writer place in the Top 100 Semifinalists list?
A. Yes, some writers may have more than one script reach the Top 100. Table Read My Screenplay is interested in promoting scripts as well as writers, and as such we choose the Top 100 scripts that we receive to move on to the Semifinals.

Q: Are Shorts part of the Top 100 Semifinalists list?
A: Shorts and Web Series Pilots will be featured onto their own Top 25 Semifinalists list. For all contests prior to 2018, Features, TV Pilots, and Shorts are all featured on the same list.


Q: I don’t live in the United States—am I still eligible?
A: Yes, we accept International entries, but all submissions must be in English.

Q: My country currently cannot do business with the US so I cannot pay; may I receive a waiver?
A: Unfortunately, at this time we cannot grant waivers.

Q: Will you pay for my flight even though I don’t live in the US?
A: Table Read My Screenplay will up to $1,500 for an international flight, and up to $800 for a domestic flight..

Q: If I choose not to fly or stay in your hotel, is there a cash equivalent?
A: No. If you decide not to utilize the flight or hotel, they are simply forfeited.

Deborah Vajda's THE BEAUTIFUL UNKNOWN wins the drama category in the 2012 TRMS contest

THE BEAUTIFUL UNKNOWN (a.k.a. THE BECKONING BUSH and THE BITTER BUSH) is the winner in the drama category of the 2012 Table Read My Screenplay contest.
read more »

Jim Farina Contest Recognition

·  2nd Place in the 2010 Inkwell Opportunity ·  Finalist in Scriptapalooza Screenplay competition beating out 3600+ International entries. ·  Semi-finalist in Table Read My Screenplay   · ...
read more »

Jeff York interviewed by International Screenwriters Association

Screenwriter Jeff York was interviewed by the International Screenwriters Association during a teleseminar on Saturday, June 29. "Machete" screenwriter Alvaro Rodriguez conducted the interview with Jeff and discussed his Grand Prize...
read more »

Sarah Brockmann's St. Jones' Ditch - Finalist

Finalist (top 100) - Table Read My Screenplay 2011 and Top 100, Emerging Screenwriters' Competition 2012.
read more »

Annika Tuneld, new Swedish Writer, optioned her English Screenplay

My name is Annika Tuneld and I live in Sweden. After going through a divorce and trying to create a new life for me and my two daughters, I decided to start writing movies. I wrote my first words in English in July 2010 and three months later, I...
read more »

Edward Ybarra\'s \"A DELIBRATE WOMAN\" reaches Semi-Finals in Austin, Texas

Ybarra's provocative story of seduction was a Semi-finalist at the 2013 Table Read My Screenplay Contest in Austin, Texas.
read more »

JS Mayank\'s Emit is Award Winner and in 18 festivals!

EMIT won Best Screenplay, Best Dialogue and Best Ending at FRAPA - Screenplay Festival of Audiovisual de Porto Alegre, Brazil. It won Best American Short Film at the Chinese American Film Festival, Best Sci-Fi Short at the Philip K Dick Science...
read more »

Rod Thompson\'s \"The Squire\" a Finalist in Table Read Contest

Previously rated an 8 on Franklin Leonard's, "The Squire" continues to perform well, now placing as a finalist in the Table Read My Screenplay Contest. An emotional, heartwarming tale of an imaginative young...
read more »

THE SCOUNDRELS CLUB by Jeff York wins Table Read\'s Grand Prize @ Sundance

Jeff York was invited to Sundance as guest of honor for winning Grand Prize for his screenplay, "The Scoundrels Club", for the 2013 Sundance Film Festival "Table Read My Screenplay" contest. His script was chosen from over 1000+...
read more »

THE CONFESSION OF LIZZIE BORDEN by Jeff York makes Austin Table Read finals

Two of Jeff York's scripts just were announced as finalists in the 2013 Table Read My Screenplay contest which will be part of the Austin Film Festival this year. His psychological thriller THE CONFESSION OF LIZZIE BORDEN and his black comedy...
read more »

Stuart Land\'s family script won category for Table Read My Screenplay

So stoked that my family screenplay, Todd McCoy's Adventure West, won the top honor in the action adventure category in the Table Read My Screenplay contest, especially since it's a period piece. 
read more »

Table Read My Screenplay \"Hollywood\" 2009

Winner - I Hate People -  Table Read My Screenplay Hollywood 2009 in the Comedy Feature Category.
read more »

Peter Wisan placed as a semi-finalist in Table Read My Screenplay

Peter Wisan's screenplay, Strings, placed in the semi-final category for the Sixth Annual Table Read My Screenplay Contest. This script is about an aged music teacher and a violin prodigy finding beauty in a  dystopia.
read more »

Rick Markus\' Chicago Nine-Eleven - finalist in multiple contests

Chicago Nine-Eleven placed Top 100 in Emerging Screenwriters, was a Table Read My Screenplay 2012 Semi-finalist and a Scriptapalooza 2012 Quarter-finalist.
read more »

Margie Kaptanoglu wins Short Script Grand Prize in Table Read My Screenplay

Marjory Kaptanoglu's short sci-fi screenplay, BLEEDING EDGE, was the Short Script Grand Prize Winner in the 2013 Table Read My Screenplay in Austin contest. Her script received a table read at the 2013 Austin Film Festival with Alvaro Rodriguez...
read more »


ENSNARED was named "Best Horror Script" at the 2013 Table Read My Screenplay - Austin Film Festival. 
read more »

Maria Lennon\'s script named \"Best Historical\" - Table Read My Screenplay

THE PUZZLE PEOPLE, a screenplay adaptation won  best screenplay in the "historical category" with Table Read My Screenplay, Austin; Quarter Finalist with Story Pros, and First Place with the Gideon Film Festival in Orlando. The Puzzle...
read more »

Rod Thompson Won Best Drama for The Squire

Rod Thompson's The Squire took home top prize in the January announcement of the top genre winners for the Table Read My Screenplay Competition, selected from over 1200 entrants.
read more »

Julien Deladriere wins 3rd place in 2013 Fresh Voices Screenplay Contest

Julien Deladriere won third place in the 2013 Fresh Voices Screenplay Competition with his original sci-fi pilot Storm Up The Sky. The same script previously won a special mention in the 2013 Table Read My Screenplay Contest, and was also a...
read more »


Danturu The Lost Birds written by Lorena Escalante has been awarded Best Screenplay in the Animation/Fantasy genre category in the 2013 Table Read My Screenplay Contest. "There's a very creative concept here, one that serves as both an...
read more »

Jeff York Two-Time Finalist at the 2014 Creative World Awards

The announcement of the first round of finalists for this year's Creative World Awards screenwriting contest has been made and Jeff York has two scripts in the running. His western "The Scoundrels Club" was named to the short list of...
read more »

Jeff York Places Two Projects At Table Read My Screenplay Semifinals

Two different scripts by Jeff York have advanced to the Semifinals of the 2014 Table Read My Screenplay contest. HIs TV show HISTORY/HERSTORY, a kids talk show where the celebrity guests are figures from history, is in the top 100 scripts out of...
read more »

Jeff York's THE SCOUNDRELS CLUB Advances At Austin Film Fest

It has just been announced that Jeff York's adventure "The Scoundrels Club" has advanced in the 2014 Austin Film Festival screenwriting contest. There were over 6700 entries this year and that places Jeff's script in the top 15%....
read more »

ISA's Table Read Semifinalist, Aaron Rollins, Signs with CAA & Echo Lake

Due to the exposure Rollins received from being a Semifinalist in the 2014 Table Read My Screenplay competition for his television pilot, ORDNUNG, he has signed by CAA (Olivia Blaustein & Barry Kotler) and Echo Lake Management (Zadoc Angell)....
read more »

Two Jeff York Scripts Make Emerging Screenwriters Competition Final 100

Two of Jeff York's scripts made it to the top 100 screenplays for the finals of the 2015 Emerging Screenwriters Screenplay Competition. His western adventure "The Scoundrels Club" advanced, as didhis dark comedy "Play Dirty"....
read more »

Amy Amani, multiple options and contest placer

Amy's TV pilot, Dazzleland, was in development with Mozark Productions. It placed in three contests, and won the TV Pilot Category in the Table Read My Screeplay contest. It was one of the 5% of submitted scripts awarded a full read by the BBC...
read more »

Amy Amani & Scott Gibson's Pilot "Dazzleland" Optioned by Mozark Prods

"Dazzleland" is an hour long fantasy drama about the ghostly inhabitants of the titular abandoned amusement park. Pitched as a ghost story told by ghosts. The pilot eposide placed in several contests (Quarterfinalist in Happy Writers,...
read more »

Robert Wooldridge's Nate of America A Table Read Semifinalist

Robert Wooldridge's story of an eight year old runaway has made the semifinals in Table Read My Screenplay Contest.
read more »

Liam Hayes' script places in the Table Read My Screenplay 2015 semi-finals

Pottersville, Liam Hayes' original TV pilot about a novice private eye in 1940s Hollywood, has made it to the semi-finals of the 2015 Table Read My Screenplay competition. 
read more »


Michelle Daniel's hour-long pilot DOWNBEAT GANGSTERS won best overall drama at the 2015 Table Read My Screenplay (Hollywood) screenplay contest. A second pilot DREAMWALKERS received special distinction.
read more »

Gary Files Table Read My Screenplay Semifinalist

Gary has found success through the Table Read My Screenplay competition with his screenplay "Simon Says" in the Hollywood 2015 contest, and with "The Great Frobisher"  at the Sundance, 2014 contest.
read more »

Hahn's OASIS - Best Horror Scrip Table Read My Screenplay - Hollywood 2015

OASIS is a horror story played out in the Libyan Sahara. It is largely 2 locations with an ensemble cast. It has been likened to Moby Dick in the desert and lends itself to being the first movie in a series franschise.  Dinosaurs have nothing...
read more »

Multiple Contest Wins - 7+ scripts

*see for details of all contest wins & placements for all scripts:   • EVANGELINA - OPTIONED: GRAND PRIZE WINNER (StoryPros Int'l) + finalist in 7 other contests; • THE TREASURE GALLEONS: WINNER (LA Lift-Off Film...
read more »

Table Read My Screenplay Grand Prize Winner Optioned By Original Film

The Grand Prize Winner of Table Read My Screenplay - London, Derek Asaff, has optioned his script, THE WHEELMAN, to Executive Producers, Tania Landau and Neil H. Moritz of Original Film (22 JUMP STREET, FURIOUS 7, GOOSEBUMPS). The script is...
read more »


On only its second outing in competition, Wendy's teleplay EARTH NOW INC. "Honey, You Can't Make Up This Stuff" was selected as one of six official finalists in the current Oregon International Film Awards. A pilot for a procedural...
read more »

"The Valley" Semi-Finalist in ISA's 2015 Table Read My Screenplay!

Duncan Ralston's TV pilot script, "The Valley," is one of 100 Semi-Finalists in ISA's 2015 Table Read My Screenplay! With more than 1400 entries, that puts it in the top 7%. Contests finalists and Grad Prize will be announced...
read more »

Erica & Bryan Diamond's screenplay TRIPLE receives honors

Several years ago, I pulled our optioned script our of a direct to dvd and on demand film package, deciding we really had a gem on our hands we could polish.  To test our theory, we did as polish and submitted our script to various contest and...
read more »

Uprising (aka The Revolt of the Whales) by Michael Rhodes

Rhodes' The Revolt of the Whales (Uprising) received First Prize - Science Fiction in the Table Read My Screenplay competition for its fascinating portrayal of the surreal underwater world of the whales as they are prodded into...
read more »

Devin Mainville's short screenplay 'Wrong Number' 2017 accolades

Devin Mainville's short screenplay has garnered a lot of attention in 2017, notably being the Winner - March 2017 Live Read L.A, receiving 6th place in the 2017 Table Read my Screenplay Contest – New Orleans, and being a Finalist in the...
read more »

SECRET AND CONFIDENTIAL selected as TRMS semi-finalist.

SECRET AND CONFIDENTIAL, a one hour pilot and political thriller by Ben Maraniss, dramatizing the rise of Patricia Lewis from suburban housewife to one of the most powerful women in the country through her work as an operative for the mafia, the...
read more »

CHASING THE LEMON makes Semi-Finals in Table Read My Screenplay Hollywood

Mary Goldman's comedy feature CHASING THE LEMON progressed to the Semi-Finals in Table Read My Screenplay Hollywood, where the winning writer gets a live table read, and the chance to attend the Hollywood Pitch Fest.
read more »

There are no judges bio linked to this contest.


Genre: Action/Adventure

I can’t say that I’ve ever experienced a script or film about Canadian political espionage before. For that alone, I thought that this script had a uniquely engaging subject matter. While I might have heard rumblings about Quebec’s separatist factions, this script digs deep into the divergence of the political philosophies in that part of Canada. Essentially, there are those who wish Quebec to be self-governed and separate from the rest of the country, and those who wish to keep Canada united under one national banner. Somewhere caught in the middle is Patrick, our protagonist. Clearly, Patrick falls on the side of the Alliance for a Unified Canada, but when he is being used as a pawn for their less-than-above-the-board leadership, his return to his RCMP roots is inevitable. I liked that the writer had a pretty clear way of presenting the political dichotomy, and also that he did a good job of showing that Patrick was between a rock and a hard place. As a protagonist, Patrick worked for me, because he didn’t relish his return to police espionage, but I believed that he didn’t have much of a choice, and that his motives for involvement as a sort-of spy were pure. In other words, I trusted him – which, I would assume, is exactly what the writer was going for.


I also thought that the writer was quite inventive in his creation of death devices. I loved that the rifles were controlled by scopes and remotes embedded in cameras. In this way, there didn’t even have to be anyone touching the guns in order for them to perform their assassination. Also, this gave plenty of great opportunities for the devices to be used to different ends. The final showdown between English, the political figures, and Patrick, the writer makes great use of these guns in the action. I thought that this scene was really well-paced and well-timed in its placement within the script. The description kept the action clear, and it was fun to follow.


I would have liked to see a bit more action earlier in the script, though. I didn’t feel a strong sense of danger for Patrick until the last 25 pages of the screenplay. I think that one way to heighten the tension would be to do some work on Munroe’s credibility. Since Patrick is already aware, from his run-in at the train station, that English killed Simon, it isn’t much of a stretch for the reader to instantly cotton-on to the fact that Munroe must be in cahoots. When this is revealed in a straightforward manner to the reader, I think that any reader would already know this fact from earlier context clues. I think that he writer could have made this collusion between Munroe and English more of a surprise. I’d rather see this as a powerful revelation, and a useful turning point in the plot. As it is currently written, I feel that it lacks the power for which it has potential.


Besides this, I feel that the writer didn’t do the necessary work in the plot to maximize the presence of Monique in Patrick’s life. Although we meet her in the second act as a waitress who piques Patrick’s interest, her agency in the events of the plot are minimal until the very last moment. There isn’t any work done by the writer to develop a relationship or a connection between these two characters. When Patrick asks Monique to take him out on the town, I felt that this was coming out of nowhere, and was slowing down the action of the main plot. In the middle of all this life-threatening danger, Patrick was dragging a cute waitress into the action? Why would he lose focus like this at such a vital moment? I felt that their relationship and their trust should have been developed in the first act, or at least earlier in the second act to make her involvement carry more weight. In this draft, when she is revealed as an agent, the double-cross doesn’t hold much emotional punch. Patrick barely knows her, and we have no sense that she has earned his trust before she turns around and betrays him. In other words, I didn’t feel any disappointment, but I think that I should have.

Finally, I had a hard time getting into the story in the beginning, because I was confused by the writer’s choice to cut between Patrick’s classroom in 1991, and actions that English performs in 1990. I didn’t understand why the timeline was shuffled in this manner, or in what way this was benefitting the telling of the plot. Also, I thought that Patrick’s lesson on the political unrest in Quebec went on too long. It is usually not beneficial to start off an action film with too much of a history lesson. I had to trudge through these opening scenes before I was able to settle in and enjoy the rest of the story.



Genre: Television Pilot/Episode Treatments

In the beginning, I was excited about this concept. I thought it might end up being something that sort of falls between “Hung” and “Entourage,” in that it deals with the world of taboo sexuality (in this case, porn), and the politics of Hollywood. I felt that the set up was fairly strong. Quinn, after winning Best Newcomer (a pun if ever there was one!) at Tribeca, finds that his career isn’t exactly taking the rocket trajectory he’d hoped. In order to pay back some of the debt incurred from making his independent film, he is forced to sell out his skill as a producer of pornography. The pilot and the rest of the episodes go on to deal with Quinn’s attempts to get his Plan A back on track, without having anyone discover his Plan B career. So far, so good. Supporting characters include Josh (an up and coming agent, and nephew to Joel Silver), Doug (a hapless editor who can no longer make it happen in bed with his wife), and a long string of women who give great blow jobs…huh?


We’ll get back to that in a bit.


I felt that at their best moments, the writers showed a good knack for dialogue and the ins and outs of aspiring Hollywood writers. When Quinn is pursuing his writing dream, I found the scripts and treatments to be at their most believable, but was consistently disappointed that we spent more time chasing this dream than in the much more interesting and unique world of San Fernando Valley porn. I felt that Quinn’s quest to go from indie darling to big name star treads water well covered in the already very popular and established “Entourage.” Also, I felt that the writers may be painting themselves into a corner by hinting that Quinn is so close to realizing his dream. Given that the show is called “Naughty,” and seems to be about the things Quinn is forced to do to make ends meet, I’d like the assurance that we will be seeing more of the porn world. I think this milieu has great potential for comedy. It also doesn’t seem quite as bombastically self-referential as a whole series written about writers. This is much harder to pull off as a comedy. Especially since the scene is, as I said, already sort of mined to its fullest by “Entourage.”


Structurally, I was disappointed that we had to wait until Episode Three to see exactly how Quinn ended up working in porn. I think that rather than begin mid-stream in his fledgling career, it would be funnier to see him learning the ropes of this side of the industry. I wouldn’t have minded seeing the Pilot begin with his interview at The Naughty Network and go from there. This way we would have had a better sense, from the get-go, of Quinn’s character. As it is, I didn’t feel like I had much of a feel for any of the characters until several episodes in.


In terms of content, I think that the writers might be treading dangerous waters sometimes. Granted, networks like Showtime and HBO give writers the ability to include some adult content, but when a character is supposed to be flashing a cell phone pic of a woman with a “cock in her mouth,” I wonder how this is going to play out.


Also, back to the women: I felt like the writers needed to hand their work to no less than three female friends for commentary specifically on the female characters. I got bored with the women in this script very quickly. It seemed that no matter what the woman’s background may have been, she was horny and not afraid to use all the dirty words in the land to describe exactly how horny. None of the female characters seemed to have much purpose outside of giving a heck of a blow job, so after a while, they all started to blend together, and the script started to feel mildly insulting. Given the profession of the males in this series, it might have been interesting to have at least one be a happily married man with a strong female partner, or even to have one of the TNN employees be a professional woman with a plot of their own who worked behind the camera. There needed to be much more thought put into a balance of the sexes here, rather than a smattering of horny broads to provide all the nudity desired given the subject matter.


Finally, I didn’t actually feel that this worked on an episodic level as well as it should have. I felt that the writers failed at giving each episode its own plot arc which would fit into the overall story arc for the season. There wasn’t really much of a beginning, middle and end to each individual episode – one simply picked up where the last one left off, mid-storyline. One way to accomplish this would be to focus on the supporting characters for some of the more episodic plot developments, giving a greater structure to each episode, while Quinn’s impending sale of the script becomes the main overall arc. Sometimes I felt that the writers were trying to accomplish this, but they seldom succeeded, in my opinion. As one last note, I’d like to point out that the writers did not necessarily benefit at this juncture from including so many episode treatments. Treatments for a thirty minute episodic shouldn’t be four pages of solid-block prose, either. I felt that it took me longer than the length of an episode sometimes to wade through one treatment. Treatments should be no more than two pages for an episode, and should be much less dense.